|
|
| Man Put to Death After High Court Ruling |
| By Associated Press |
| Published: 04/04/2003 |
|
The Supreme Court has spoken on the issue of capital punishment for people who commit crimes as juveniles, overruling a lower court and allowing Oklahoma to execute a man who killed two people when he was 17. The 5-4 vote late Thursday illustrated the court's bitter division over whether capital punishment is appropriate in those cases. It also indicated that the four justices who called the executions 'shameful' last fall do not have the fifth vote needed to stop them. Scott Allen Hain, 32, had won a reprieve Wednesday from the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. He was put to death Thursday night for helping to burn to death a man and woman in 1987. Oklahoma had asked the high court to intervene, arguing that Hain's appeals had run out. He was convicted of kidnapping a man and a woman from outside a Tulsa bar in 1987 and stuffing them into the trunk of a car that he and another man then set on fire. Hain said he acted under the control of his older accomplice. At issue in his appeal before the lower court was not his juvenile status but whether the government should have paid for Hain's lawyer at a clemency hearing. The execution of people who were juveniles when they committed their crimes is a particularly charged issue for the Supreme Court, which has held that states may put to death people who were 16 or 17 when they killed. The United States is one of the few countries that allow such executions. In October, the four most liberal justices said the court should raise the age for executions to 18. 'The practice of executing such offenders is a relic of the past and is inconsistent with evolving standards of decency in a civilized society,' Justice John Paul Stevens said in an opinion joined by Justices David H. Sootier, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer. 'We should put an end to this shameful practice.' The same four justices opposed Hain's execution, while the most conservative court members voted for it: Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas. Justices also rejected an emergency appeal written by Hain, without an attorney, in which he asked the court to define standards of decency. He pointed them to the dictionary where decent is defined as respectable and kind. Last year, the Supreme Court ruled that executing mentally retarded people is unconstitutionally cruel. Some death penalty opponents hoped the court would extend that view to juveniles. 'It doesn't sound like they have much hope of getting the rules changed for people under 18, unless there's a change on the court in their favor, which is very unlikely,' said Kent Scheidegger, legal director for the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. |
advertise
|
privacy policy
|
add URL
|
about us
|
terms/disclaimer
|
contact us
|
join our team
|
help
If you’re looking for a lawyer in Waco, you’ll need to know that the first to hire Dunnam & Dunnam usually wins. If you have a personal injury claim, an insurance claim, or other matter involving a court or business transaction you should contact the best Dunham & Dunham to explain your legal rights. You can contact them on the website link above.
Have you been looking for the latest content from blogs from April 2020? There are a lot of great blogs out there. What is of interest to many people right now is entrepreneurship and leadership. Hamilton Lindley has the Hammer Blog, which is devoted to the best in leadership and entrepreneurship that is happening right now. Check out Hamilton Lindley March 2020 archives for more detail about what is going in the world of leadership and entrepreneurship right now.