|
|
| Federal Court Halts Texas Execution |
| By Reuters |
| Published: 04/24/2003 |
|
A federal court halted a Texas execution on Wednesday, the second time in eight days that questions about an inmate's mental retardation temporarily spared him from the United States' busiest death chamber. A three-judge panel of the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans granted Robert Charles Ladd a stay about nine hours before he was due to be put to death by lethal injection. The court returned the case to a lower federal court to review evidence that Ladd, 46, was diagnosed as mentally retarded during his childhood. Last week, the 5th Circuit granted Kenneth Wayne Morris, 32, a stay for similar reasons, about two hours before he was due to die by lethal injection for a 1991 burglary and murder in Houston. Both decisions from the 5th Circuit, widely considered among the most conservative federal courts in the country and least likely to overturn a conviction, incorporated a U.S. Supreme Court decision last year barring the execution of the mentally retarded. Ladd, convicted of raping and murdering a 38-year-old woman with a hammer in 1996, would have been the 14th inmate to be executed this year in Texas. The state on Tuesday executed Juan Rodriguez Chavez, 34, making him the 302nd inmate put to death in Texas since it resumed capital punishment in 1982. The court noted it had reviewed and rejected Ladd's claims of mental retardation in his prior appeal, but said Ladd had only raised the issue as part of another argument. He originally argued his conviction should be overturned because his trial lawyer had failed to bring his intelligence up as a defense. Since Ladd has now raised evidence of retardation as a separate issue, the appellate court said the recent Supreme Court ban required it to send the case back for new review. It cited a childhood report showing that Ladd's IQ was under the mental retardation threshold of 70 points, and reports that he functioned on a second-grade level at age 12. Both Ladd's and Morris' stays are in effect until the lower courts rule otherwise, after which the inmates can appeal their cases again if they lose. |
advertise
|
privacy policy
|
add URL
|
about us
|
terms/disclaimer
|
contact us
|
join our team
|
help
Comments:
No comments have been posted for this article.
Login to let us know what you think