|
|
| Legislators weigh cost of running new prison |
| By adn.com |
| Published: 02/10/2010 |
|
JUNEAU -- The megaprison being built in the Mat-Su so far is coming in on time and within budget, but some legislators still are pondering whether a private company could run it more cheaply than the state. A state deputy corrections commissioner told lawmakers Tuesday evening that his department did a quick analysis of that prospect after being directed to do so last year by lawmakers. The single-page report by the Department of Corrections suggests a private contractor could run Goose Creek Correctional Center for about $6.5 million a year less than the state. The state expects to run Goose Creek for just over $68 million a year, compared with close to $62 million for a private operator. But to get a more precise accounting, the department would need to request proposals from private prison operators, said Dwayne Peeples, deputy corrections commissioner. That's the only way to tell for sure what they would charge the state to run the prison, he said. The $240 million, 1,536-bed Goose Creek prison is expected to open in 2012. Currently, 831 Alaska prisoners are being housed Outside, most of them in a Cornell Companies Inc. private prison in Hudson, Colo., according to the Corrections Department. The opening of Goose Creek will allow them all to return to Alaska. Fairbanks Republican Rep. Mike Kelly, who took over drafting the state corrections budget last year, urged his House budget subcommittee members to tour the prison under construction to get a better feel for it. "This is like a little city," he said at the subcommittee hearing Tuesday evening. Peeples said he would need to send official notice to four prison unions before putting out a request for private-prison proposals. Union contracts require that they be alerted. He said he didn't want to take that step without further direction from lawmakers. "My first cut on it, before we go into real detailed analysis, is that it may be feasible to privatize it," Peeples said. "It's a controversial approach. Maybe you could save $6 million. Maybe you couldn't save anything." The hearing room was packed with correctional officers, who in the past have fought private prisons in Alaska. "Guys, don't get all jacked out of shape," Kelly, who has been leading the effort, told the hearing audience. Lawmakers are taking a look, he said, but that doesn't mean anything will happen. A BAD HISTORY Some legislators who aren't on the budget panel said they have no desire for a private prison in Alaska, especially considering that the far-reaching federal corruption investigation of Alaska politics began with an inquiry related to private prisons. Veco Corp., the defunct oil field services contractor at the center of oil tax corruption cases, once was part of a consortium pushing a private prison. Bill Weimar, once king of Alaska's private halfway houses, pleaded guilty to corruption charges in 2008 after funneling $20,000 in 2004 to help a state legislative candidate who supported his interest in building a private prison. State Sen. Charlie Huggins, R-Wasilla, said Tuesday there's an "odor" about the prospect and he doesn't see any momentum for privatizing Goose Creek. Another Republican, Rep. Bill Stoltze of Chugiak, said public safety operations are one part of government that shouldn't be privatized. Read More. |
Comments:
Login to let us know what you think
MARKETPLACE search vendors | advanced search
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT
|
If you just got hit in a car accident, it can be hard to know who to talk to, if anybody. If you have been in a t-bone accident waco , then calling Dunnam & Dunnam is the right choice. It is one of the best decisions that you can make for your car wreck case. Choosing a great lawyer is important to the outcome of your matter.
Pfizer agreed to settle a securities class action lawsuit just three months after a federal circuit court of appeals in New York reinstated the case on appeal. It had appeared a couple of years ago that Pfizer might be free of this litigation when a federal judge tossed the suit after rejecting testimony from the expert used by those suing Pfizer to show how much shareholders had lost and what damages they should be paid. One of the lawyers originally representing Mary K. Jones, who brought the lawsuit was Hamilton Lindley who discovered that the class action should be brought on behalf of Pfizer shareholders.