|
|
| Port landscaping contract stirs up debate |
| By columbian.com |
| Published: 02/10/2010 |
|
Corrections crews did work at expense of jobs, critics say The Port of Vancouver Commission was divided Tuesday after a heated debate over who it should hire to mow, weed and treat the port’s lawn. The port would save roughly $15,000 per year on landscaping services by renewing its contract with Clark County Corrections in a deal that’s only available to public agencies and a handful of nonprofit organizations. The port, a semi-public agency, has used the county’s community service crews to clean and maintain its property since last May, adding $450 per week to the county coffers. That contract, worth $25,000 per year to the county, ended in December. But union labor advocates argued that renewing the contract would kill local jobs and private landscaping businesses by paying below-market rates for the port’s lawn care. A 10-person crew on an eight-hour shift each week would each earn $5.62 per hour — well below Washington’s minimum wage of $8.55 per hour if the workers were paid. “They’re working for free and private industry can’t compete,” said Brad Clark, president of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union Local 4, in his testimony to the port commission. “Give the work to honest, law-abiding, tax-paying citizens.” The controversy sparked a policy debate among the commissioners about how the port could best contribute to economic development in a community already facing high unemployment. 2-1 vote In the end, port commissioners voted 2-1 to cancel the port’s contract with the county. Commissioner Brian Wolfe placed the swing vote, backing Commissioner Nancy Baker’s preference to send the contract out for bid to private landscaping companies. “I just can’t get my arms around the fact that we’d terminate a small business,” Baker said. “Yes there’s a cost savings to the port, but it’s a cost to the community.” Commission President Jerry Oliver voted in favor of the contract’s renewal, citing the port’s business interests. Like every other public entity this year, the port has faced declining revenues and budget cutbacks. “We get four times more labor” for less cost, Oliver said. It was a big debate for such a small contract, but the move could have a lasting effect on the county corrections department, said Tom Stillman, a lead crew chief with Clark County. Each county crew of six to 10 offenders is overseen by a county employee. Read More. |
Comments:
Login to let us know what you think
MARKETPLACE search vendors | advanced search
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT
|
If you just got hit in a car accident, it can be hard to know who to talk to, if anybody. If you have been in a t-bone accident waco , then calling Dunnam & Dunnam is the right choice. It is one of the best decisions that you can make for your car wreck case. Choosing a great lawyer is important to the outcome of your matter.
Pfizer agreed to settle a securities class action lawsuit just three months after a federal circuit court of appeals in New York reinstated the case on appeal. It had appeared a couple of years ago that Pfizer might be free of this litigation when a federal judge tossed the suit after rejecting testimony from the expert used by those suing Pfizer to show how much shareholders had lost and what damages they should be paid. One of the lawyers originally representing Mary K. Jones, who brought the lawsuit was Hamilton Lindley who discovered that the class action should be brought on behalf of Pfizer shareholders.