>Users:   login   |  register       > email     > people    


Lawmakers weigh major changes for parole, probation
By thenewstribune.com - JONATHAN KAMINSKY; The Associated Press
Published: 03/26/2012

WA -- When veteran Department of Corrections field administrator Donta Harper was told last year about the experiment he was going to help oversee, he had misgivings.

Thirty-five Seattle parolees, he was told, would be put under a new kind of supervision. Every time they failed a drug test or blew off a meeting with a corrections officer, they’d quickly be scooped up and put in jail. After no more than three days, they’d be released. More serious offenses would result in up to 30 days in jail.

Another 35 ex-cons would make up the control group. Their oversight would be representative of how the system currently operates: less consistently, with offenses resulting in anything from a verbal reprimand to 60 days behind bars.

After six months, the parolees subject to the experimental “swift and certain” system of punishment, as proponents call it, showed dramatically lower rates of drug use. They also were less likely to be sent back to prison.

“I went into it with some skepticism. How could something so simple work?” said Harper. “But it worked.”

This pilot project now helps form the template for a proposed statewide remaking of probation and parole – collectively known as community custody – that would put Washington at the forefront of a nationwide push to change how they function.

The bill encompassing this change is not assured passage during the state Legislature’s current special session. But in large part because it promises significant efficiencies – Senate Republicans have penciled in $15 million in annual savings tied to the measure as part of their most recent budget proposal – it stands a good chance of making it into law.

“The issue from my perspective is not primarily the cost savings,” said Sen. Jim Hargrove, D-Hoquiam, the bill’s prime sponsor. “We’ve got research that shows swift and sure punishment and adding treatment is going to reduce recidivism and is going to keep the public safer.”

Opposition to the measure comes from House Republicans, who dislike that hardened ex-convicts will face reduced penalties for violating the terms of their parole. They have sought to exclude murderers, sex criminals and others guilty of serious crimes from the program.

“To put them under relaxed supervision has an impact under public safety,” said Rep. Gary Alexander, R-Thurston County. “They could reoffend, and that would be very devastating.”

The system is modeled on a program founded eight years ago in Hawaii, where Judge Steven Alm, a former prosecutor, grew frustrated upon seeing defendants show up for the first time in his courtroom only after repeatedly violating the terms of their probation.

Read More.





Comments:

No comments have been posted for this article.


Login to let us know what you think

User Name:   

Password:       


Forgot password?





correctsource logo




Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of The Corrections Connection User Agreement
The Corrections Connection ©. Copyright 1996 - 2025 © . All Rights Reserved | 15 Mill Wharf Plaza Scituate Mass. 02066 (617) 471 4445 Fax: (617) 608 9015