|
|
| Arizona Case Could Affect Death Penalty |
| By Associated Press |
| Published: 04/23/2002 |
|
Timothy Ring believes he wouldn't be living in a cell on Arizona's death row if a jury, not a judge, had decided his fate. Ring, a former state corrections officer sentenced to death for killing an armored truck guard during a 1994 robbery, said the jury that convicted him never heard the evidence a state judge later used to condemn him. 'I was essentially given two trials,' Ring said recently as he sat in an interview cell. 'One before a jury and then one before a judge.' Ring's argument has advanced his case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, where justices will hear arguments Monday. The high court's decision on the case, which is expected by early summer, could change the way the death penalty is handed down in nine states where judges, not juries, determine capital murder sentences. A narrow ruling might only affect a handful of inmates. But some death penalty experts believe a broad court decision could pave the way for the resentencing of as many as 800 people on death row in the nine states. 'This has the potential to be major,' said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, a death penalty research group. 'What's being fought for is the right to have a jury decide who lives and who dies.' Currently, juries in Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana and Nebraska have no role in sentencing the people they convict in capital cases. In Florida, Alabama, Delaware and Indiana, juries make sentencing recommendations, but judges make the final decision. Indiana, however, recently passed a law that will require judges to follow a jury's sentencing recommendations. The issue in Ring's case is whether a judge alone can determine the aggravating factors, such as the heinous nature of a murder or whether it was committed for monetary gain, necessary in some states to turn a murder conviction into a death sentence. After the jury in Ring's trial was dismissed, the judge heard testimony at a sentencing hearing from one of Ring's accomplices who said Ring planned the robbery and murdered the guard. The judge then determined that the aggravating factors warranted death. 'Our argument is that if you can be sentenced to death by a determining fact, that fact has to be determined by a jury, not a judge finding,' said Ring's attorney, Andrew Hurwitz. Arizona Attorney General Janet Napolitano, who will argue the case for the state, said judges' experience and legal knowledge often better equips them to make a death sentence determination. |
advertise
|
privacy policy
|
add URL
|
about us
|
terms/disclaimer
|
contact us
|
join our team
|
help
Hiring an attorney can present confusing situations for someone. It’s hard to tell whether you’ll get the best service possible in your situation. You likely have a lot of questions. Will your lawyer hand off your matter to someone else? Will your lawyer return your phone calls? It’s hard to know without someone you can trust. If you been hit by distracted driver in Waco you need a lawyer. People in Central Texas have trusted Dunnam & Dunnam for almost 100 years for their most pressing legal concerns. They understand the value of a good advocate. They’re a family helping Waco families since 1925.